Fulbright AssociationArchbishop Tutu
 





Fulbright Association
1100 G Street, N.W.
Suite 525
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 347-5543
Fax: (202) 347-6540

Franz Vranitzky Speaks to Fulbrighters

I am deeply moved and honored for having been selected to receive this year's Fulbright Prize for International Understanding. Joining ranks with Nelson Mandela and Jimmy Carter, two outstanding leaders and two exceptional human beings whose achievements have always been an inspiration to my own work, is indeed among the crowning moments of my many years in public service. I humbly accept the Prize not only on my own behalf, but on behalf of the Austrian people who have built--out of the ashes of war and tyranny--a prosperous and stable democracy which has come to terms with its history and has reclaimed its place in the Europe of the future--a country we have all the right to be proud of. But we are living in a time of tremendous changes: the globalization of economic relations, demographic and social pressures, the strain on our natural environment, pathbreaking technological developments like the digital revolution, all these factors challenge the wisdom of our conventional policy-making and render many of our national political instruments and programs inefficient, insufficient and inadequate.
European Integration
The only way to master these new challenges is through common action and joint strategies, which transcend the patterns of traditional cooperation. This is exactly why Austria decided to join the European integration process and became a member of the European Union in January this year.
But European integration to us is much more than free trade or a common social and environmental policy. It means to actively participate in a common endeavor to establish lasting and comprehensive peace and stability on a continent which for centuries had been ravaged by wars and nationalistic violence. European integration is a very complex and sometimes contradictory process. And its vigor has been put to an additional test by the dramatic transformation in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union after 1989.
The collapse of communism has dramatically reduced the threat of a military confrontation; at the same time, new insecurities and potentially destabilizing factors have emerged, such as: social and economic disparities, migratory movements; organized crime, unsafe nuclear reactors and aging atomic weapons, and above all the danger of new wave of nationalism and the disintegration of multiethnic states. But the changes in the former communist world have also created enormous new possibilities for cooperation; and we have to take advantage of these opportunities to a much larger extent than we have done so far.
I think we have every reason to do so: every dollar, every ECU which we invest in the success of the democratic and economic reform process is a direct investment in our own stability and security. Austria therefore fully supports the intention of the Central and Eastern European states--and especially our immediate neighboring countries--to join the process of European integration as quickly as possible; and we are prepared to assist them, both through national and multilateral programs, in achieving this goal.
Economic Reconstruction
But to tackle the immense scope of problems associated with the creation of a "Europe whole and free," we in the West will have to mobilize all our imagination and determination; and we will have to do so for years to come. I know that this is not easy in a time when the public attention span tends to reach no further than to the latest headline.
The task of restructuring the economies of the new democracies is enormous, and the Western assistance which has so far been provided remains a rather sketchy patchwork. Regretfully, we were not able to mobilize right from the beginning the necessary political will for a coordinated program of reconstruction as it was done through the Marshall Plan after World War II.
The success of economic transformation is still the most important precondition to permanently secure the victory of democracy and open societies in the post-communist countries. There is simply no alternative to continuing our efforts and our assistance for the reform process.
We have to sit down together and to develop new financing mechanisms; set priorities; harmonize policies and strategies; eliminate obstacles to trade and investment; and win over the private sector for new types of partnership to further this cooperation.
Infrastructure Development
A priority of common action is the development of infrastructure modern networks of transportation, telecommunications and energy supply as a prerequisite for dynamic growth and attraction of investment.
In the framework of the so called "Trans-European Networks," the European Union has decided to modernize its own infrastructure. I strongly advocate taking the program one step further and include the reform countries in this effort. It will not only give an additional boost to the restructuring of their economies and create important employment opportunities; new infrastructure links between East and West are also a visible signal that our aim is not to create new dividing lines, but to bridge and eliminate old ones.
 
To speed up this process, I initiated a framework for regional infrastructure projects. Our first focus country was Hungary, and together with interested Western partners concrete projects in the field of energy, transport and environment could be identified and brought closer to realization. Next spring, this initiative will be extended to Slovenia, with Slovakia being next in the line.
So far, I have concentrated on cooperation between the reform countries and the West. Of equal importance is the improvement of relations between the new democracies in the European East.
Although we have seen encouraging developments like the setting up of the Central European Free Trade Association, and the emerging of cooperative structures within the Community of Independent States, there are still many political and historic barriers which hamper the vast potential for cooperation among the countries of the former communist bloc.
Austria has been very active in promoting this kind of cooperation in order to contribute to stability and to mutual understanding in the area. Already in 1989, we co-founded, together with Italy, a forum for regional consultations which today, under the name of "Central European Initiative", brings together 14 reform countries for regular meetings on a broad range of issues. In addition, I inaugurated a special trilateral cooperation between Austria, Slovakia and Hungary. Joint programs in the field of foreign and security policy, home affairs and cross-border cooperation aim at confidence building to overcome the latent conflict over the issue of ethnic minorities between these two countries.
Privileged by geographic location, longstanding historic ties and her status of neutrality, Austria started to develop relations with the East long before the historic year of 1989. When the barbed wire fences finally were cut and the mine fields cleared, Austrian business people, journalists and scientists could already rely on a network of well-established contacts and a wealth of know-how in dealing with the reform countries.
Today, Austrian entrepreneurs are among the most active investors and joint venture partners in the whole region, and the Austrian government provides, after Germany, the second-highest per capita rate of financial and technical assistance. These efforts have made Austria the Western country with the closest relations to the new democracies.
Just last month, I opened in Vienna a conference bringing together the deputy prime ministers for economic affairs of all the successor states of the former Soviet Union; during the very same week, an international meeting focused on a huge transcontinental pipeline project that should link Central Asia with Europe, underlining Austria's continuing role as gateway between East and West.
Preventing New Dividing Lines
n all our efforts to strengthen the ties with the post-communist countries, our most important objective is to prevent the creation of new dividing lines in Europe. And every step taken by the West, be it in economic and trade relations or in the field of security policy has to be measured against this overall goal. When focusing on the importance of regional integration we have to make one point clear: these regional entities--be it the European Union, NAFTA or the new groupings developing in South America and South East Asia--these regional entities must not become self-centered and inward-looking. They have to perceive each other as partners within a global framework, rather than as opponents and competitors.
I have on various occasions warned against this danger of fortress-building; and I will continue to strongly advocate such an open door policy towards all regions of the world.
This includes the development of a comprehensive special relationship with the Russian Federation and the Ukraine, a close cooperation with the Mediterranean, and, above all, a new and enhanced transatlantic partnership. Neither "spaghetti wars" and fishery disputes nor short-lived fads of neo-isolationism will ever be strong enough to break the close historic and cultural ties which bind us together.
Prospects for Peace
In the historic year of 1989, many of us in the West were full of hope that with the end of the great ideological confrontation the time had finally come for global peace and democracy; some even went as far as to proclaim the "end of history."
But soon these hopes were shattered by Sarajevo and Srebrenica, in Kurdistan, in the Caucasus and in the refugee camps of Rwanda. And the inhuman cynicism of "ethnic cleansing" which we had to witness in all these flashpoints of crisis has demonstrated in the most drastic way that we still have a long way to go until the solemn commitments of the UN Charter have become living reality for all human beings.
Once the voices of reason and humanism have been drowned out by nationalistic propaganda, once violence and war have broken out, it is a long and painful process to restore peace and reconciliation. With this in mind, all our expectations and hopes are focused on the ongoing negotiations in Dayton, to bring peace to the peoples of former Yugoslavia; and we all wish them success.
Common Bond of Human Dignity
Senator Fulbright once stated, and I quote: "The rapprochement of peoples is only possible when the difference of culture and outlook are respected rather than feared and condemned; when the common bond of human dignity is recognized as the essential bond for a peaceful world."
The breakthrough between Israel and the Palestinians and the peaceful transition in South Africa have shown what can be achieved through determination and good will. And the moving words which King Hussein of Jordan spoke at the funeral of Yitzhak Rabin are testimony to the victory of peace and human dignity over destruction and human suffering.
This bond of human dignity, just like the basic rights and freedoms of man, is universal, and its substance remains the same, wherever it is at stake; be it in a democracy or under a totalitarian regime. And neither the level of development nor the cultural background should be used as an excuse for its violation or neglect.
Various analysts of international relations have stated that with the end of the Cold War a fundamental new gap has opened between liberal, Western-style democracies and the societies based on Islam or other cultural traditions. It is true, there is a dividing line; but this line is not new, and it is not separating religions and civilizations; it is running between openness and suppression; between tolerance and fanaticism; between cooperation and self-isolation.
I am personally convinced that the best precondition for peace, democracy and human rights is to secure an acceptable standard of living for all nations in the world. And we in the so-called "wealthy North" have a common responsibility to help create this precondition, and to contribute our share to such a global framework of prosperity and stability.
We cannot tolerate poverty and exclusion, unemployment and disease in wide parts of the world and at the same time expect that all those living under such conditions live together peacefully and observe the rules of democracy that we are used to.
In the end, democracy and the rule of law, just like durable peace, cannot be transplanted or enforced from outside, but have to be achieved and secured by the peoples themselves. What the international community must do is to stand for its ideals and values through a constant process of dialogue and the support all those forces which represent tolerance and understanding all over the world.
Challenges to Peace
But I would like to warn against complacency and self-satisfaction: the realization of peace and democracy is a task which is never finished. It is a challenge which every country, every society has to permanently strive for. And nobody in political office can shy away from this responsibility. Let me return to Senator Fulbright, who stated: "If ever a universal victory for democratic values comes within reach, it will come not through acts of foreign policy, and certainly not through military policy, but rather through the magnetism of freedom itself. The prospects for freedom depend ultimately on how it is practiced in free societies."
Especially in times of fundamental change, when people feel insecure about their own future, political developments may occur which run counter to our basic values and aspirations--even in our well-established democracies. I am thinking of a certain readiness to believe in authoritarian and antidemocratic slogans; I am thinking of intolerance, bigotry and xenophobia; and I am thinking of individual acts of terror and violence which unfortunately we experience--in Europe, in the Middle East, and even here in the United States.
Just as we cannot accept that the people of the Third World are kept outside of global development, we cannot tolerate that broad sectors of our own populations are economically and socially pushed to the fringes of society. Social exclusion does not only create material poverty, it fertilizes the breeding grounds for radicalism and nationalism.
Political Leadership
What we need is political leadership to address these fundamental issues. But we need leadership not only in economic, social or foreign policy. We also need it to give credibility to our values of tolerance, national consensus and international understanding. To me, this means political education in its broadest sense.
Senator Fulbright was such a prominent leader who realized the importance of this task. And the program which carries his name has surely done more to advance the cause of peace and understanding than any other initiative in this field.
I hope for all of us that this legacy--the program--will be preserved and kept strong for the years to come, as one of the best investments into our own common future.
In this sense, and in memory of my friend Yitzhak Rabin, I decided to donate the $50,000 award associated with the prize to an initiative which fully reflects the vision of Senator Fulbright: the Mideast Youth Peace Program, an Austrian project bringing together young people from Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Egypt and Austria to pass on the message of peace and understanding to the next generation.
A few weeks ago, an important Austrian Peace Prize was awarded, it was awarded to Mr. Saro-Wiwa of Nigeria. Mr. Saro-Wiwa could not appear in Vienna to receive the prize. He sent his young son. At the receiving ceremony, the young man said he was all but sure he would see his father again, who had been in prison at that time for quite a period, again. The inhuman and criminal Nigerian regime proved very soon that the son's fear was very realistic. It is with deep concern and with disgust that we will have to reconsider our relationship to those who right now are in command, unfortunately in command in Nigeria. And I think it is not only our task to express disgust but again and again we have to ask ourselves what have we done? Have we done enough to reach our goals? Have we done enough over the past fifty years to reach our ultimate goals of peace, democracy and global development? I think that we achieved a lot. Step by step we advanced the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. We have encouraged democratic structures and made sustainable development a common task for the international community. But these promising signs are still threatened by regional conflicts and civil wars, by poverty, illiteracy, and the dangers of nationalism and fundamentalism.
The challenges ahead of us are enormous, and the lesson we have to draw is simple--redouble our efforts and invest more than ever into the greatest potential we possess--our human resources. What we need is twofold: a strong political vision, and a determined, pragmatic hands-on approach to make our dreams become reality.
Senator Fulbright once said: "Our future is not in the stars but in our own minds and hearts;" and I might add, it is in our own hands.
Presented Nov. 11 at the 1995 Fulbright Prize ceremony at the U.S. Department of State.
See also: